Kemei Km 1990
VS
Promax 1100Pro
Feature Comparison
General features
General features
| Clipper Classification | Single linear blade | Single linear blade |
|---|---|---|
| Clipper Class | Clipper | Clipper |
| Body Design Type | Regular/Normal | Regular/Normal |
| Movable Head Series | No | No |
Technical features
Technical features
| Display Type | Yes | No |
|---|---|---|
| Cutting Technique of Device | Direct cut | Direct cut |
| Head Angle Adjustment | Yes | Yes |
| Blade Material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Cutting Size Range | 0.1 to 3 mm | - |
| Water Resistance | No | No |
| Battery Charging Time | 180 minute (min) | - |
| Maximum Battery Life | 120 minute (min) | - |
| Fast Charging Capability | Yes | No |
| Blade width | - | 41 millimeter (mm) |
| Number of Head Adjustment Steps | - | 5 stages |
| Device Operating Voltage | - | 220 volt (v) |
Main features
Main features
| Connection Type | Wireless (detachable cable for wireless use of the device) | Wired (cable permanently attached to the device) |
|---|
Capabilities
Capabilities
| Zero Cut Capability | Yes | Yes |
|---|---|---|
| Line Cutting Capability | Yes | Yes |
| Shadow Cutting Capability | Yes | Yes |
| Device Status Display | Via LED display | - |
| Wet Shaving Capability | Yes | No |
Aesthetic features
Aesthetic features
| Body Material | Plastic | Plastic |
|---|---|---|
| Product Weight | 300 gram (g) | 500 gram (g) |
| Cord Length | - | 3 meter (m) |
Power supply and battery life
Power supply and battery life
| Power Source Type | - | Mains power |
|---|
Disclaimer: Information on this page may need review. If you notice any discrepancies, please report them
User Rating Comparison
Kemei Km 1990
0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Promax 1100Pro
0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Questions and Answers About This Comparison
No questions have been asked about this comparison yet.
Be the first to ask a question!
Your question will be displayed after approval
