Price Comparison
No stores registered at this time
VS
Amd Raden R9 260
VS
Nvidia Tesla M2050
Feature Comparison
Processor or chip
Processor or chip
| Chipset Model |
|---|
General features
General features
| Microarchitecture type | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lithography type | 28nm | 40nm |
Processing power
Processing power
| Number of processor cores | 896 stream processor | 448 core |
|---|---|---|
| Processor base frequency | 1100 megahertz (mhz) | 575 megahertz (mhz) |
| Processor boost frequency | - | 1150 megahertz (mhz) |
Central Processor (CPU)
Central Processor (CPU)
| Computational Power | 2 teraflops (tflops) | 1.030 teraflops (tflops) |
|---|---|---|
| Other Processing Features | - | 56 Texture Mapping Units (TMU) / 48 Render Output Units (ROP) |
Technical features
Technical features
| Memory Capacity |
|---|
Main features
Main features
| Memory Type |
|---|
Storage memory
Storage memory
| Memory Bandwidth | 104.0 GB/s | 148.4 GB/s |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Width | 128 bit | 384 bit |
Energy efficiency
Energy efficiency
| Graphics Card Power Consumption | ||
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Recommended Power Supply | ||
| Power Connector | - | One 6-pin and one 8-pin |
Type of storage
Type of storage
| Memory Connection Port |
|---|
Other features or capabilities
Other features or capabilities
| DirectX Version | ||
|---|---|---|
| OpenGL Version | ||
| OpenCL Version | ||
| Simultaneous Multi-GPU Setup | No | No |
| Price at Launch | - | 2699 dollar ($) \$ |
Video output ports
Video output ports
| Output Ports | - | No output port |
|---|
Aesthetic features
Aesthetic features
| Height Dimensions | - | 2 slots |
|---|
Disclaimer: Information on this page may need review. If you notice any discrepancies, please report them
User Rating Comparison
Amd Raden R9 260
0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Nvidia Tesla M2050
0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Questions and Answers About This Comparison
No questions have been asked about this comparison yet.
Be the first to ask a question!
Your question will be displayed after approval
