Amd Radeon R9 Fury
VS
Nvidia Tesla K20
Feature Comparison
Processor or chip
Processor or chip
| Chipset Model |
|---|
General features
General features
| Microarchitecture type | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lithography type | 28nm | 28nm |
Processing power
Processing power
| Number of processor cores | 3584 stream processor | 2496 core |
|---|---|---|
| Processor base frequency | 1000 megahertz (mhz) | 706 megahertz (mhz) |
Central Processor (CPU)
Central Processor (CPU)
| Computational Power | 7.1 teraflops (tflops) | 3.524 teraflops (tflops) |
|---|---|---|
| Other Processing Features | - | 208 Texture Mapping Units (TMU) / 40 Render Output Units (ROP) / Available in two models: Active K20c (with fan) and Passive K20m (without fan) |
Technical features
Technical features
| Memory Capacity |
|---|
Main features
Main features
| Memory Type |
|---|
Storage memory
Storage memory
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 208 GB/s |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Width | 4096 bit | 320 bit |
Energy efficiency
Energy efficiency
| Graphics Card Power Consumption | ||
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Recommended Power Supply | ||
| Power Connector | Two 8-pin | One 6-pin and one 8-pin |
Type of storage
Type of storage
| Memory Connection Port |
|---|
Other features or capabilities
Other features or capabilities
| DirectX Version | ||
|---|---|---|
| OpenGL Version | ||
| Simultaneous Multi-GPU Setup | Yes | No |
| Price at Launch | 549 dollar ($) \$ | 3199 Dollars |
| OpenCL Version | - |
Video output ports
Video output ports
| Output Ports | - | No output port |
|---|
Aesthetic features
Aesthetic features
| Height Dimensions | - | 2 slots |
|---|
Disclaimer: Information on this page may need review. If you notice any discrepancies, please report them
User Rating Comparison
Amd Radeon R9 Fury
0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Nvidia Tesla K20
0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Questions and Answers About This Comparison
No questions have been asked about this comparison yet.
Be the first to ask a question!
Your question will be displayed after approval
