Price Comparison
VS
Basickaws 120W USB C Fast Charger
VS
tearplex 96W USB-C Charger
Feature Comparison
Power & Output
Power & Output
| Output Wattage (W) | 120 | 96W |
|---|---|---|
| Charging Protocols | USB Power Delivery | USB Power Delivery (PD) |
| Charging Efficiency (%) | 97 | Up to 98% |
| MacBook Pro 16" Charge Time (0-100%) | 1 Hour 20 Minutes | 1h 35min |
| Mobile Phone Charge Time (0-80%) | 18 minutes | - |
Connectivity & Compatibility
Connectivity & Compatibility
| Connector Type | USB-C | USB-C |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Ports | 1 | 1 |
| Cable Detachability | No | Detachable |
| Compatible Devices (Laptops) | MacBook Pro (13, 14, 15, 16 inch), MacBook Air | MacBook Pro, MacBook Air, Dell, Lenovo, HP |
| Compatible Devices (Tablets) | IPad Pro, IPad Air | IPad Pro |
| Compatible Devices (Phones) | Samsung Galaxy, All USB C Device | Samsung Galaxy, All USB-C phones |
| Supported PD Profiles (W) | Up to 120 | - |
Physical Attributes
Physical Attributes
| Cable Included | Yes | Yes |
|---|
Safety & Certifications
Safety & Certifications
| Protection Features | Short-circuit protection, Over-heating protection | Over-current, Over-voltage, Overload, Temperature, Short-circuit Protection |
|---|---|---|
| Smart Chip Integration | Yes (built-in IC chip) | Yes |
Dimensions & Weight
Dimensions & Weight
| Product Dimensions | 3 x 3 x 1 inches | - |
|---|---|---|
| Cable Length | 6.6 ft (2 meters) | 6.6 Ft (2m) |
Disclaimer: Information on this page may need review. If you notice any discrepancies, please report them
User Rating Comparison
Basickaws 120W USB C Fast Charger
0
/10
from total 1 Vote
tearplex 96W USB-C Charger
0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Questions and Answers About This Comparison
No questions have been asked about this comparison yet.
Be the first to ask a question!
Your question will be displayed after approval
