Price Comparison
VS
No stores registered at this time
Beyerdynamic Fox
VS
Zico U 300H
Feature Comparison
Main features
Main features
| Number of Microphones | 1 piece | 1 piece |
|---|---|---|
| Microphone Type by Application | Desktop | Handheld |
| Microphone Technology Type | Condenser | Dynamic |
| Connection Type | Wired | Wireless |
| Transmitter/Receiver Combination | Without independent receiver and transmitter | Transmitter and microphone integrated with independent receiver |
| Optimal Operating Range | - | 150 meter (m) |
Technical features
Technical features
| Frequency Response Range | 20-20000 hertz (hz) | - |
|---|
Technical details of the microphone
Technical details of the microphone
| Sound Sensitivity | 15 decibel (db) | |
|---|---|---|
| Headphone Output Impedance | 80 ohm (Ω) | - |
| Microphone Impedance | - | 600 ohm (Ω) |
| Microphone Battery Life | - | Up to 5 hours |
Receiver technical details
Receiver technical details
| Sound Output Power | 13 milliwatt (mw) | - |
|---|
Aesthetic and supplementary features
Aesthetic and supplementary features
| Microphone Cable Length | 2 meter (m) | - |
|---|---|---|
| Headphone Monitoring Output | 3.5mm jack | - |
Aesthetic features
Aesthetic features
| Product Weight | 500 gram (g) | - |
|---|
Disclaimer: Information on this page may need review. If you notice any discrepancies, please report them
User Rating Comparison
Beyerdynamic Fox
0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Zico U 300H
0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Questions and Answers About This Comparison
No questions have been asked about this comparison yet.
Be the first to ask a question!
Your question will be displayed after approval
