Blue Yeti X
VS
Hyperx Quadcast
Feature Comparison
Main features
Main features
| Number of Microphones | 1 piece | 1 piece |
|---|---|---|
| Microphone Type by Application | Desktop | Desktop |
| Microphone Technology Type | Condenser | Electret condenser |
| Connection Type | Wired | Wired |
| Transmitter/Receiver Combination | Without independent receiver and transmitter | Without independent receiver and transmitter |
| Maximum Output Power | 72 milliwatt (mw) | - |
Technical details of the microphone
Technical details of the microphone
| Diaphragm diameter size | 14 millimeter (mm) | 14 millimeter (mm) |
|---|---|---|
| Bitrate | 24 bit | - |
| Headphone Output Impedance | 16 ohm (Ω) | - |
| Signal-to-Noise Ratio (S/N Ratio) | 100 decibel (db) | |
| Microphone Voltage and Current Consumption | ||
| Sound Sensitivity | - | |
| Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) | - | Less than 0.05% |
Technical features
Technical features
| Frequency Response Range | 20-20000 hertz (hz) | 20-20000 hertz (hz) |
|---|
Aesthetic and supplementary features
Aesthetic and supplementary features
| Microphone Cable Length | 2 meter (m) | 2.9 meter (m) |
|---|---|---|
| Headphone Monitoring Output | 3.5mm jack | 3.5mm jack |
Aesthetic features
Aesthetic features
| Body Material | Metal | Metal |
|---|---|---|
| Size and Dimensions | 110 × 122 × 289 mm (microphone and stand) | 103.1 x 129 x 249.9 mm (microphone and stand) |
| Product Weight | 1.28kg (microphone and stand) | 712 g (Microphone & Stand) |
Disclaimer: Information on this page may need review. If you notice any discrepancies, please report them
User Rating Comparison
Blue Yeti X
0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Hyperx Quadcast
0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Questions and Answers About This Comparison
No questions have been asked about this comparison yet.
Be the first to ask a question!
Your question will be displayed after approval
