Hyperx Quadcast
VS
Boya By Wm3T2 U2
Feature Comparison
Main features
Main features
| Number of Microphones | 1 piece | 2 piece |
|---|---|---|
| Microphone Type by Application | Desktop | Lavalier |
| Microphone Technology Type | Electret condenser | - |
| Connection Type | Wired | Wireless |
| Transmitter/Receiver Combination | Without independent receiver and transmitter | Transmitter and microphone integrated with independent receiver |
| Optimal Operating Range | - | 50 meter (m) |
Technical details of the microphone
Technical details of the microphone
| Diaphragm diameter size | 14 millimeter (mm) | - |
|---|---|---|
| Sound Sensitivity | ||
| Signal-to-Noise Ratio (S/N Ratio) | 77 decibel (db) | |
| Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) | Less than 0.05% | - |
| Microphone Voltage and Current Consumption | - | |
| Bitrate | - | 16 bit |
Technical features
Technical features
| Frequency Response Range | 20-20000 hertz (hz) | 20-16000 hertz (hz) |
|---|
Aesthetic and supplementary features
Aesthetic and supplementary features
| Microphone Cable Length | 2.9 meter (m) | - |
|---|---|---|
| Headphone Monitoring Output | 3.5mm jack | - |
Aesthetic features
Aesthetic features
| Body Material | Metal | - |
|---|---|---|
| Size and Dimensions | 103.1 x 129 x 249.9 mm (microphone and stand) | 15.6 x 17.5 x 52 mm (transmitter) / 9 x 26.2 x 46 mm (receiver) |
| Product Weight | 712 g (Microphone & Stand) | 8.5g (transmitter) ** 5g (receiver) |
Transmitter technical details
Transmitter technical details
| RF Output Power | - | |
|---|---|---|
| Transmitter Battery Power | - | |
| Transmitter Operating Time | - | Up to 10 hours |
Disclaimer: Information on this page may need review. If you notice any discrepancies, please report them
User Rating Comparison
Hyperx Quadcast
0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Boya By Wm3T2 U2
0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Questions and Answers About This Comparison
No questions have been asked about this comparison yet.
Be the first to ask a question!
Your question will be displayed after approval
