Earldom Et Mc3C
VS
Saramonic Blink900 B2
Feature Comparison
Main features
Main features
| Number of Microphones | 1 piece | 2 piece |
|---|---|---|
| Microphone Type by Application | Lavalier | Lavalier |
| Connection Type | Wireless | Wireless |
| Transmitter/Receiver Combination | Transmitter and microphone integrated with independent receiver | Transmitter and receiver independent of microphone |
| Optimal Operating Range | 20 meter (m) | 200 meter (m) |
Transmitter technical details
Transmitter technical details
| Transmitter Battery Power | ||
|---|---|---|
| Transmitter Voltage and Current Consumption | - | |
| Transmitter Operating Time | - | Up to 6 hours |
Technical details of the microphone
Technical details of the microphone
| Diaphragm diameter size | - | 4 millimeter (mm) |
|---|---|---|
| Bitrate | - | 24 bit |
| Signal-to-Noise Ratio (S/N Ratio) | - | |
| Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) | - | Less than 0.1% |
Technical features
Technical features
| Frequency Response Range | - | 20-20000 hertz (hz) |
|---|
Receiver technical details
Receiver technical details
| Receiver Battery Power | - | |
|---|---|---|
| Receiver Voltage and Current Consumption | - | |
| Receiver Operating Time | - | Up to 6 hours |
Aesthetic and supplementary features
Aesthetic and supplementary features
| Headphone Monitoring Output | - | 3.5mm jack |
|---|
Aesthetic features
Aesthetic features
| Size and Dimensions | - | 16.4 x 43.5 x 43.5 mm (transmitter) / 16.4 x 46 x 46 mm (receiver) / 51 x 87.2 x 186 mm (charging case) |
|---|---|---|
| Product Weight | - | Transmitter: 33.6 g / Receiver: 35.3 g / Charging Case: 278 g |
Disclaimer: Information on this page may need review. If you notice any discrepancies, please report them
User Rating Comparison
Earldom Et Mc3C
0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Saramonic Blink900 B2
0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Questions and Answers About This Comparison
No questions have been asked about this comparison yet.
Be the first to ask a question!
Your question will be displayed after approval
