Price Comparison
VS
IFEART 70W USB-C MacBook Charger
VS
tearplex 96W USB-C Charger
Feature Comparison
Power & Output
Power & Output
| Output Wattage (W) | 70W | 96W |
|---|---|---|
| Charging Protocols | USB Power Delivery (PD) | USB Power Delivery (PD) |
| Charging Efficiency (%) | - | Up to 98% |
| MacBook Pro 16" Charge Time (0-100%) | - | 1h 35min |
Connectivity & Compatibility
Connectivity & Compatibility
| Connector Type | USB Type-C | USB-C |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Ports | 1 | 1 |
| Cable Detachability | Detachable | Detachable |
| Compatible Devices (Laptops) | MacBook Air/Pro (M1/M2/M3/M4), Dell, Lenovo, HP, Surface | MacBook Pro, MacBook Air, Dell, Lenovo, HP |
| Compatible Devices (Tablets) | iPad Pro, iPad Air, iPad Mini | IPad Pro |
| Compatible Devices (Phones) | iPhone 15/16 | Samsung Galaxy, All USB-C phones |
| Supported PD Profiles (W) | 70W, 67W, 65W, 61W, 45W, 30W, 20W | - |
Physical Attributes
Physical Attributes
| Cable Included | Yes (6.6ft USB-C To USB-C) | Yes |
|---|
Safety & Certifications
Safety & Certifications
| Protection Features | Overcharging, Short Circuiting, Overheating | Over-current, Over-voltage, Overload, Temperature, Short-circuit Protection |
|---|---|---|
| Smart Chip Integration | Yes | Yes |
Dimensions & Weight
Dimensions & Weight
| Product Dimensions | 3 x 3 x 1.2 inches | - |
|---|---|---|
| Product Weight | 0.44 lbs | - |
| Cable Length | 6.6 Ft (2m) | 6.6 Ft (2m) |
Disclaimer: Information on this page may need review. If you notice any discrepancies, please report them
User Rating Comparison
IFEART 70W USB-C MacBook Charger
0
/10
from total 1 Vote
tearplex 96W USB-C Charger
0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Questions and Answers About This Comparison
No questions have been asked about this comparison yet.
Be the first to ask a question!
Your question will be displayed after approval
