Price Comparison
VS
IKNUH 140W USB-C PD Charger White
VS
tearplex 96W USB-C Charger
Feature Comparison
Power & Output
Power & Output
| Output Wattage (W) | 140 | 96W |
|---|---|---|
| Charging Protocols | USB PD 3.1, PPS | USB Power Delivery (PD) |
| Input Voltage Range (V) | 100-240V | - |
| Input Frequency (Hz) | 50/60Hz | - |
| MacBook Pro 16" Charge Time (0-100%) | Approx. 30 mins to 60-80% | 1h 35min |
| Charging Efficiency (%) | - | Up to 98% |
Connectivity & Compatibility
Connectivity & Compatibility
| Connector Type | USB-C To Magnetic 3 | USB-C |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Ports | 1 | 1 |
| Cable Detachability | Detachable | Detachable |
| Compatible Devices (Laptops) | MacBook Pro 14/16" (2021-2026), MacBook Air 13/15" (2021-2024) | MacBook Pro, MacBook Air, Dell, Lenovo, HP |
| Compatible Devices (Tablets) | - | IPad Pro |
| Compatible Devices (Phones) | - | Samsung Galaxy, All USB-C phones |
Physical Attributes
Physical Attributes
| Cable Included | Yes (2M Magnetic 3) | Yes |
|---|
Safety & Certifications
Safety & Certifications
| Protection Features | Over-voltage, Over-current, Short-circuit Protection | Over-current, Over-voltage, Overload, Temperature, Short-circuit Protection |
|---|---|---|
| Smart Chip Integration | Yes (Dynamic Power Adjustment, Battery Health Management) | Yes |
Dimensions & Weight
Dimensions & Weight
| Cable Length | 2m / 6.6ft | 6.6 Ft (2m) |
|---|
Disclaimer: Information on this page may need review. If you notice any discrepancies, please report them
User Rating Comparison
IKNUH 140W USB-C PD Charger White
0
/10
from total 1 Vote
tearplex 96W USB-C Charger
0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Questions and Answers About This Comparison
No questions have been asked about this comparison yet.
Be the first to ask a question!
Your question will be displayed after approval
