Price Comparison
VS
Kingston KC600 SATA3 mSATA 256GB Internal SSD
VS
Samsung 990 EVO Plus 1TB M.2 NVMe SSD
Feature Comparison
Capabilities
Capabilities
| Encryption Technology | Yes | Supported |
|---|---|---|
| Compatible Operating Systems | - | PC, Laptops |
| Additional Features | - | HMB Technology, Intelligent Turbowrite 2.0 |
Technical features
Technical features
| Memory Capacity | 256 GB | 1TB |
|---|---|---|
| Flash Memory Specifications | 3D TLC | Latest NAND |
| Sequential Read Speed | 550 MB/s | 7150 MB/s |
| Sequential Write Speed | 500 MB/s | - |
| Random Read Speed | 90000 IOPS | - |
| Random Write Speed | 80000 IOPS | - |
| Average Lifespan | 150 | - |
| Operating Temperature Range | 0 - 70 °C | - |
| Controller | - | Nickel-coated controller |
Aesthetic features
Aesthetic features
| Size and Dimensions | mSATA (29.9 * 50.8 * 4.85 mm) | M.2 2280 |
|---|---|---|
| Product Weight | 6 g | - |
Type of storage
Type of storage
| Memory Connection Port | Serial ATA III | M.2 2280 |
|---|---|---|
| Storage Connection Details | No | PCIe Gen 4x4 / PCIe Gen 5x2 |
| Memory Usage Type | Internal | NAND Flash |
Main features
Main features
| Connection Type | - | NVMe |
|---|
Additional features and options
Additional features and options
| Box Contents | - | SSD (MZ-V9S1T0B/AM) |
|---|
General specifications
General specifications
| Device Design and Dimensions | - | M.2 2280 Form Factor |
|---|
General features
General features
| Power Consumption | - | Efficient |
|---|
Disclaimer: Information on this page may need review. If you notice any discrepancies, please report them
User Rating Comparison
Kingston KC600 SATA3 mSATA 256GB Internal SSD
0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Samsung 990 EVO Plus 1TB M.2 NVMe SSD
0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Questions and Answers About This Comparison
No questions have been asked about this comparison yet.
Be the first to ask a question!
Your question will be displayed after approval
