Nvidia Tesla K20X
VS
Matrox C900 E4Gbf
Feature Comparison
Processor or chip
Processor or chip
| Chipset Model |
|---|
General features
General features
| Microarchitecture type | - | |
|---|---|---|
| Lithography type | 28nm | - |
Processing power
Processing power
| Number of processor cores | 2688 core | - |
|---|---|---|
| Processor base frequency | 732 megahertz (mhz) | - |
| Processor boost frequency | 1300 megahertz (mhz) | - |
Central Processor (CPU)
Central Processor (CPU)
| Computational Power | 3.935 teraflops (tflops) | - |
|---|---|---|
| Other Processing Features | 224 Texture Mapping Units (TMU) / 48 Render Output Units (ROP) | - |
Technical features
Technical features
| Memory Capacity |
|---|
Main features
Main features
| Memory Type |
|---|
Storage memory
Storage memory
| Memory Bandwidth | 249.6 GB/s | - |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Width | 384 bit | - |
Energy efficiency
Energy efficiency
| Graphics Card Power Consumption | - | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Recommended Power Supply | - | |
| Power Connector | One 6-pin and one 8-pin | - |
Video output ports
Video output ports
| Output Ports | No output port | 9x Mini HDMI ports |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Image Resolution | - |
Type of storage
Type of storage
| Memory Connection Port |
|---|
Other features or capabilities
Other features or capabilities
| DirectX Version | ||
|---|---|---|
| OpenGL Version | ||
| OpenCL Version | ||
| Simultaneous Multi-GPU Setup | No | No |
| Price at Launch | 7699 dollar ($) \$ | - |
Aesthetic features
Aesthetic features
| Height Dimensions | 2 slots | 1 slot |
|---|
Disclaimer: Information on this page may need review. If you notice any discrepancies, please report them
User Rating Comparison
Nvidia Tesla K20X
0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Matrox C900 E4Gbf
0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Questions and Answers About This Comparison
No questions have been asked about this comparison yet.
Be the first to ask a question!
Your question will be displayed after approval
