Price Comparison
VS
No stores registered at this time
Redragon Quasar Gm200
VS
Rode Nt2 A
Feature Comparison
Main features
Main features
| Number of Microphones | 1 piece | 1 piece |
|---|---|---|
| Microphone Type by Application | Desktop | Studio |
| Microphone Technology Type | Condenser | Condenser |
| Connection Type | Wired | Wired |
| Transmitter/Receiver Combination | Without independent receiver and transmitter | Without independent receiver and transmitter |
Technical features
Technical features
| Frequency Response Range | 50-16000 hertz (hz) | 20-20000 hertz (hz) |
|---|---|---|
| Noise Level | - | 7 decibel (db) |
Technical details of the microphone
Technical details of the microphone
| Sound Sensitivity | ||
|---|---|---|
| Microphone Impedance | 200 ohm (Ω) | |
| Microphone Voltage and Current Consumption | 5 volt (v) | - |
| Diaphragm diameter size | - | 25.4 millimeter (mm) |
Aesthetic and supplementary features
Aesthetic and supplementary features
| Microphone Cable Length | 1.5 meter (m) | - |
|---|
Aesthetic features
Aesthetic features
| Body Material | Plastic | - |
|---|---|---|
| Size and Dimensions | 88 * 170 * 230 millimeter (mm) | 55 * 55 * 209 millimeter (mm) |
| Product Weight | - | 860 gram (g) |
Disclaimer: Information on this page may need review. If you notice any discrepancies, please report them
User Rating Comparison
Redragon Quasar Gm200
0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Rode Nt2 A
0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Questions and Answers About This Comparison
No questions have been asked about this comparison yet.
Be the first to ask a question!
Your question will be displayed after approval
