VS
VS

Sigma 18 200Mm F35 63 Dc Macro Os Hsm C vs Sigma 60mm F2.8 DN Art Lens

Feature Comparison

Main components
Main components
Lens Technology Zoom Lens Prime Lens
Max Format Dimensions
Focal Length in Millimeters 18-200 mm 60 millimeter (mm)
Image Stabilization Feature Yes No
Lens Mounts Micro Four Thirds, Sony E
Diaphragm settings
Diaphragm settings
Maximum Aperture (f-stop) F3.5–6.3
Minimum Aperture
Aperture Control Ring No No
Optical features
Optical features
Number of Optical Elements -
Number of Optical Groups -
Special Optical Elements SLD glass element, double-sided aspherical lens SLD lens
Minimum Focusing Distance 0.39 m (15.35 inches) 0.50 m (19.69 inches)
Maximum zoom level 0.33 times (e.g., 2x for 2 times) 0.14 times (e.g., 2x for 2 times)
Focus features
Focus features
Auto Focus Yes Yes
Internal focus motor Stepper motor
Permanent Manual Focus Capability No No
Focus Operation Method Internal -
Aesthetic features
Aesthetic features
Product Weight 430 gram (g) 190 gram (g)
Body material and design
Body material and design
Diameter 71 mm (2.8 inches) 61 mm (2.39 inches)
Length 86 mm (3.4 inches) 56 mm (2.19 inches)
Environmental Resistance No No
Filter Diameter 62 millimeter (mm) 46 millimeter (mm)
Zoom mechanism Rotary (extending length) -
Power Zoom No No
Zoom Lock Yes No
Tripod Mount Tab No No
Hood - Yes
Other items or details
Other items or details
Release Date
Disclaimer: Information on this page may need review. If you notice any discrepancies, please report them

User Rating Comparison

Sigma 18 200Mm F35 63 Dc Macro Os Hsm C
0 /10
from total 1 Vote
Sigma 60mm F2.8 DN Art Lens
0 /10
from total 1 Vote

Questions and Answers About This Comparison

No questions have been asked about this comparison yet.

Be the first to ask a question!

Your question will be displayed after approval

Rate and Review This Comparison

Write at least 10 characters
Search Product to Compare