VS
VS

Sigma 18 200Mm F35 63 Dc Os Hsm vs Sigma 60mm F2.8 DN Art Lens

Feature Comparison

Main components
Main components
Lens Technology Zoom Lens Prime Lens
Max Format Dimensions
Focal Length in Millimeters 18-200 mm 60 millimeter (mm)
Image Stabilization Feature Yes No
Lens Mounts Canon EF-S, Nikon F (DX), Sigma SA Bayonet Micro Four Thirds, Sony E
Diaphragm settings
Diaphragm settings
Maximum Aperture (f-stop) F3.5–6.3
Minimum Aperture F22–40
Aperture Control Ring No No
Optical features
Optical features
Number of Optical Elements -
Number of Optical Groups -
Special Optical Elements One SLD element, three aspherical elements SLD lens
Minimum Focusing Distance 0.45 m (17.72 inches) 0.50 m (19.69 inches)
Maximum zoom level 0.26 times (e.g., 2x for 2 times) 0.14 times (e.g., 2x for 2 times)
Focus features
Focus features
Auto Focus Yes Yes
Internal focus motor Stepper motor
Permanent Manual Focus Capability No No
Focus Operation Method Internal -
Aesthetic features
Aesthetic features
Product Weight 600 gram (g) 190 gram (g)
Color Options Black -
Body material and design
Body material and design
Diameter 79 mm (3.11 inches) 61 mm (2.39 inches)
Length 98 mm (3.86 inches) 56 mm (2.19 inches)
Material Plastic body, Metal mount -
Environmental Resistance No No
Filter Diameter 72 millimeter (mm) 46 millimeter (mm)
Hood Yes Yes
Zoom mechanism Rotary (extending length) -
Power Zoom No No
Zoom Lock Yes No
Tripod Mount Tab No No
Other items or details
Other items or details
Release Date
Disclaimer: Information on this page may need review. If you notice any discrepancies, please report them

User Rating Comparison

Sigma 18 200Mm F35 63 Dc Os Hsm
0 /10
from total 1 Vote
Sigma 60mm F2.8 DN Art Lens
0 /10
from total 1 Vote

Questions and Answers About This Comparison

No questions have been asked about this comparison yet.

Be the first to ask a question!

Your question will be displayed after approval

Rate and Review This Comparison

Write at least 10 characters
Search Product to Compare