VS
VS

Sigma 18 300 F35 63 Dc Macro Os Hsm C vs Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG Macro HSM II Lens

Feature Comparison

Main components
Main components
Lens Technology Zoom Lens Zoom Lens
Max Format Dimensions 35mm full-frame
Focal Length in Millimeters 18-300 mm 70-200 mm
Image Stabilization Feature Yes No
Lens Mounts
Diaphragm settings
Diaphragm settings
Maximum Aperture (f-stop) F3.5–6.3
Minimum Aperture
Aperture Control Ring No No
Optical features
Optical features
Special Optical Elements Four F Low Dispersion elements, one Special Low Dispersion element Two ELD elements, two SLD elements
Minimum Focusing Distance 0.39 m (15.35 inches) 1.00 m (39.37 inches)
Maximum zoom level 3 times (e.g., 2x for 2 times) 0.28 times (e.g., 2x for 2 times)
Number of Optical Elements -
Number of Optical Groups -
Focus features
Focus features
Auto Focus Yes Yes
Internal focus motor
Permanent Manual Focus Capability Yes Yes
Focus Operation Method Lens extension Internal
Aesthetic features
Aesthetic features
Product Weight 584 gram (g) 1390 gram (g)
Color Options Black Black
Body material and design
Body material and design
Diameter 79 mm (3.11 inches) 87 mm (3.41 inches)
Length 101.5 mm (4 inches) 184 mm (7.24 inches)
Environmental Resistance No No
Filter Diameter 72 millimeter (mm) 77 millimeter (mm)
Hood Yes Yes
Zoom mechanism Rotary (extending length) Rotary (internal)
Power Zoom No No
Zoom Lock Yes No
Tripod Mount Tab No Yes
Material - Metal mount
Other items or details
Other items or details
Release Date
Disclaimer: Information on this page may need review. If you notice any discrepancies, please report them

User Rating Comparison

Sigma 18 300 F35 63 Dc Macro Os Hsm C
0 /10
from total 1 Vote
Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG Macro HSM II Lens
0 /10
from total 1 Vote

Questions and Answers About This Comparison

No questions have been asked about this comparison yet.

Be the first to ask a question!

Your question will be displayed after approval

Rate and Review This Comparison

Write at least 10 characters
Search Product to Compare