Earldom Et Mc3C
VS
Funsnap Mic Tok
Feature Comparison
Main features
Main features
| Number of Microphones | 1 piece | 1 piece |
|---|---|---|
| Microphone Type by Application | Lavalier | Lavalier |
| Connection Type | Wireless | Wireless |
| Transmitter/Receiver Combination | Transmitter and microphone integrated with independent receiver | Transmitter and microphone integrated with independent receiver |
| Optimal Operating Range | 20 meter (m) | 80 meter (m) |
| Microphone Technology Type | - | Condenser |
Transmitter technical details
Transmitter technical details
| Transmitter Battery Power | ||
|---|---|---|
| Transmitter Voltage and Current Consumption | - | 3.7 volt (v) |
| Transmitter Operating Time | - | Up to 6 hours |
Technical features
Technical features
| Frequency Response Range | - | 100-10000 hertz (hz) |
|---|
Technical details of the microphone
Technical details of the microphone
| Sound Sensitivity | - | |
|---|---|---|
| Bitrate | - | 16 bit |
| Signal-to-Noise Ratio (S/N Ratio) | - | 63 decibel (db) |
| Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) | - | Less than 0.1% |
Aesthetic features
Aesthetic features
| Size and Dimensions | - | 17 x 19.2 x 54.8 mm (transmitter) / 11.2 x 23 x 75.6 mm (receiver) |
|---|---|---|
| Product Weight | - | 10 g (Transmitter) / 5 g (Receiver) |
Disclaimer: Information on this page may need review. If you notice any discrepancies, please report them
User Rating Comparison
Earldom Et Mc3C
0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Funsnap Mic Tok
0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Questions and Answers About This Comparison
No questions have been asked about this comparison yet.
Be the first to ask a question!
Your question will be displayed after approval
