Price Comparison
VS
T ATHINK 70W USB C Charger
VS
tearplex 96W USB-C Charger
Feature Comparison
Power & Output
Power & Output
| Output Wattage (W) | 70W | 96W |
|---|---|---|
| Charging Protocols | USB PD | USB Power Delivery (PD) |
| Input Voltage Range (V) | 100-240V | - |
| Input Frequency (Hz) | 50/60Hz | - |
| Charging Efficiency (%) | - | Up to 98% |
| MacBook Pro 16" Charge Time (0-100%) | - | 1h 35min |
Connectivity & Compatibility
Connectivity & Compatibility
| Connector Type | USB-C | USB-C |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Ports | 1 | 1 |
| Cable Detachability | Detachable Cable | Detachable |
| Compatible Devices (Laptops) | MacBook Air 13/15", MacBook Pro 14" (M1/M2/M3/M4/M5) | MacBook Pro, MacBook Air, Dell, Lenovo, HP |
| Compatible Devices (Tablets) | - | IPad Pro |
| Compatible Devices (Phones) | - | Samsung Galaxy, All USB-C phones |
Physical Attributes
Physical Attributes
| Cable Included | Yes, 2M Braided USB-C to USB-C Cable with LED | Yes |
|---|
Safety & Certifications
Safety & Certifications
| Protection Features | Overcharging, Short Circuit, Overheating | Over-current, Over-voltage, Overload, Temperature, Short-circuit Protection |
|---|---|---|
| Smart Chip Integration | Yes, for intelligent charging and temperature monitoring | Yes |
Dimensions & Weight
Dimensions & Weight
| Product Dimensions | 2.48 x 2.48 x 1.02 inches | - |
|---|---|---|
| Product Weight | 0.34875 Pounds | - |
| Cable Length | 6.6ft (2m) | 6.6 Ft (2m) |
Disclaimer: Information on this page may need review. If you notice any discrepancies, please report them
User Rating Comparison
T ATHINK 70W USB C Charger
0
/10
from total 1 Vote
tearplex 96W USB-C Charger
0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Questions and Answers About This Comparison
No questions have been asked about this comparison yet.
Be the first to ask a question!
Your question will be displayed after approval
